Ok, even though I think Russell is the best overall player in Survivor history, I can understand the jury not wanting to make him the winner. Once he had made it to the final three, he should have started playing a “nice” game to the jury. He did apologize for offending anyone, but also refused to say he would do anything different. Even though I agree with him, he could’ve scored some votes if he would’ve just said something like: “Ya know what? I played the game as well as I could to get me to the end. Yeah I had to lie and backstab, but I didn’t break any rules, I won my share of challenges, including the last one, and I’m here at the end. I would appreciate your votes.”
Oh well, it didn’t work out for him
I can also somewhat understand why Parvati didn’t win, because I kind of think she road Russell’s coattails, but she was also a great competitor who won her share of challenges, and did her best to outwit, outlast and outplay.
SO HOW THE HELL DID THE JURY DECIDE TO GIVE IT TO SANDRA? SERIOUSLY? The only thing I really remember he doing, was finding the hidden immunity idol and not telling anyone about it. Did I hear correctly tonight that she has NEVER won a challenge? LOL.
Way to go jury members, for screwing up one of the best seasons of Survivor.
To end on a positive note, here is a picture of Parvati and her awesome flat stomach.